How to understand AI Sovereignty in EU
When European boards talk about “AI sovereignty,” they are usually wrestling with a quieter, more practical anxiety: not where the tin sits, but who can compel access, who can read the logs, and how easy it will be to unwind a choice when the world shifts. Compliance is a threshold, not a destination ; it tells you whether you may proceed, not whether you are in control. The sharper conversation is about jurisdiction layered over routing, about telemetry as much as inference, and about exit paths that don’t break the product. In that light, choosing between Claude on Bedrock and GPT on Azure is less about model poetry and more about plumbing you would be comfortable defending to a regulator and explaining to a customer. On AWS, Anthropic’s Claude through Bedrock is a good example of EU residency done with a clear spine: deploy via Ireland or Stockholm and requests stay within a single region; pick Frankfurt or Paris and you’ll use the EU cross‑region inference profile, keeping data w...